Quote from scrapbookpages on HoloHoax topic
-
The brick chimney was added after the war by the Soviets - it does not
connect to the building, there is a gap between the chimney and
building that you can even walk through, it is that wide. The bricks
used differ from those in the original building's construction. Pre-war
and post-war photos (look for them online, they can be found) clearly
prove that the chimney was added later.
- The door leading into the 'gas chamber' is wooden, it opens
inwards (the corpses would have prevented the door from being opened),
it is not sealed on all sides in any way whatsoever (gas would have
leaked out), it would have been beaten off its hinges, or pounded into
pieces, by people wanting to escape.
- The interior walls, if Zyklon B had been used repeatedly, would
have been stained blue by the hydrogen cyanide, which is a distinctive
signature of such gas. No such staining exists in that building. Not a
single trace, and I looked very carefully. Not only that, Zyklon B
pellets, such as those that are claimed to have been used, require warm
air of 25 degrees Celsius or higher in order effectively release the
gas into the surrounding air.
The average year-round temperature at Auschwitz is (or was in the
1940s, who knows now with climate change) 8 degrees Celsius. The
Degesch company that manufactured Zyklon B knew this, and therefore
manufactured air heaters/blowers to be used when the pellets were used
for typhus lice disinfestation purposes (which was the stated purpose
of Zyklon B, and why it was in the camps in the first place). There are
buildings (in Auschwitz-Birkenau) constructed for disinfestation of
lice, and these DO have the distinctive blue staining of the walls (so
much so that the stains came all the way through the bricks!), plus
they utilised the Degesch heaters. However, the tour staff will not
point these buildings out to visitors, they walk people right past them
saying nothing, and no one is allowed near them any more, for obvious
reasons.
- The holes in the roof where Zyklon B pellets were allegedly
poured from above were crudely smashed into the concrete (steel rebar
protrudes from some of them), and poor quality carpentry was used to
construct vents and lids over the top (these are now rotten with age).
Compared to other vents on the roof over other parts of the building
(the room above the cremation ovens, for example) it is obvious that
they were constructed from different materials, using different
techniques, and with different levels of construction knowledge.
Ask yourself whether the Germans, famed for their technical skill and
quality in all areas during that age, would have made such a botched
job of building a gas chamber. If they were going to kill massive
numbers of humans they would have applied themselves to the job in all
aspects of it, from the outset, using the best designs, materials and
construction techniques - not some pathetic attempt at retrofitting
which would have seriously endangered the people operating it and
anyone nearby. Which leads me to...
- There is a building directly next to the 'gas chamber' which
served as the hospital for SS staff. Were the Germans insane to think
that the gases being emitted from cremation of prisoners killed with
Zyklon B would not affect recovering patients in the hospital next
door? Additionally, the house where Rudolf Hoss lived with his wife and
children was approximately a hundred metres away to the southeast.
Would you, if you were in charge of camp where thousands were being
killed with poison gas, permit your precious family to live anywhere
near it? It doesn't make sense, and that is the whole point.
Occam's Razor leads one to decide that the most likely reason for all
of this was to implicate the German regime in a crime they did not
commit, for nefarious purposes.
Facts cannot be racist, or 'anti-semitic' (God, how I hate that word!),
and it is facts (not 'eyewitness' statements or hearsay) that will
cause the Holohoax collapse in on itself as one of the most audacious
lies ever spun, and pulled over the eyes of the world!
You do not need to enact laws to protect history, unless you are trying
to protect a lie!
From Lectures on the Holocaust Germar Rudolph
P. 207-210
3.4.2. Mass Murder Scenes R:
From Lectures on the Holocaust Germar Rudolph
P. 207-210
3.4.2. Mass Murder Scenes R:
There are basically two ways of getting
a picture of what happened in Auschwitz. You can either go to
original sources and read and analyze the thousands of documents and
statements by witnesses, or else you can reach for a book published
by the institution that claims to be the ultimate authority on the
subject. That is the Polish State Museum at Auschwitz. Needless to
say, almost everyone chooses the latter method. Who has the time and
resources for the former? For this reason, I would like to briefly
summarize the literature published by the Auschwitz State Museum. I
would like to briefly describe the museum's official history of
Auschwitz and its presentation of the alleged extermination process.
It goes like this: In the summer of 1941, Camp Commandant Hoer
receives oral orders to get the camp ready to exterminate Jews. Early
in September 1941, in the cellar of a building in the main camp,
there is an experimental gassing of several hundred Soviet POWs using
the cyanide based pesticide Zyklon B In the following weeks the
morgue of the crematory in the main camp is converted into a
homicidal gas chamber. The conversion consists of knocking holes in
the concrete roof so that Zyklon B can be dumped into the room below.
This gas chamber begins operation around the end of 1941 and is in
use until early 1943 (see the plans of this crematory in Ill. 71, p.
252).
The "selection" of victims is performed next to the
railroad tracks in front of the main camp. Those prisoners who are
able to work are accepted in the camp, while those unable to work are
sent directly to "gas chambers." The bodies of the victims are
then cremated in the room next to the gas chamber, which originally
contained two double-muffle crematory ovens (later there were
three.) In the first half of 1942, two old farmhouses outside the
Birkenau camp are converted to gas chambers. These are called
"Bunker 1" and "Bunker 2" or sometimes "Red House" and
"White House." These continue in operation until the beginning of
1943. With the deportation of the Hungarian Jews in May 1944, one of
these farmhouses (Bunker 2) is reactivated as a homicidal facility.
The victims of these Bunkers are cremated over wood fires in trenches
that are several meters deep. Melted human fat is retrieved with
large ladles and used as fuel for the fires.
In the summer of 1942
planning begins for four new crematories in Birkenau, built as two
pairs with mirror like symmetry. Two of these have underground
morgues, one of which is used as an undressing room and the other as
a gas chamber. In addition each has an oven room equipped with five
triple-muffle ovens, making a total of 15 muffles (see crematories II
and III, Ill. 62f., p. 242). The other two crematories (no. IV and
V474) both have a mortuary above ground and an oven room with an
eight-muffle oven, as well as three smaller rooms used as "gas
chambers." These crematories go into operation one after the other
between March and June 1943. Crematories IV and V quickly fall out of
operation because of defective construction. Crematory IV is never
repaired, Crematory V very late in the war. The ovens of Crematories
II and III remain in operation, with interruptions, until the end of
1944. In the underground gas chambers of Crematories II and III, just
as in the crematory in the main camp, Zyklon B is dumped through
openings, which were chiseled through the reinforced concrete roof
after construction was completed. The gas chambers of Crematories IV
and V, which are above ground, have small hatches in the walls
through which the pesticide is introduced. The only gas chambers
provided with ventilation are those in Crematories I, II, and III.
Thus the poison gas cannot be forced out of the gas chambers in
Crematories IV or V or the two farm houses. One has to rely solely on
the natural ventilation through opened doors and hatches.
L: I beg your pardon?
R: One moment please. Let me first finish my overview.
Until May 1944, victim selection takes place at the railroad tracks
of the main camp, but after that on the new ramp built at Birkenau.
Those selected for gassing are told that for hygienic reasons they
have to shower and have their clothes deloused. The victims disrobe,
partly in special buildings or rooms and partly in the open.
Sometimes they are given soap and towels. Then they are directed into
the gas chambers, some of which are equipped with phony shower heads
in order to trick the victims. After the doors are sealed, pesticide
is thrown into the chamber in quantities sufficient to kill insects.
A few minutes later, everybody is dead. After about a quarter hour
the doors are opened and the so-called Sonderkommandos (prisoner
special unit) begin the task of removing the corpses from the gas
chamber. Sometimes they wear gas masks, sometimes they don't. They
harvest hair from the corpses and extract gold teeth. Then they drag
the corpses to the crematory ovens or incineration trenches. The
ovens are stuffed chock full of bodies, up to eight in a single
muffle. Flames and thick black smoke shoot out of the crematory
chimneys and huge incineration trenches. The entire area is blanketed
in smoke and the hellish stench of burning flesh. At least 10,000
Jews are murdered every day between May and September 1944. Most of
the resulting corpses are burned in open trenches.
L: How many victims are supposed to have been crammed in these alleged
gas
chambers at a time?
R: The witnesses do not agree on this. For the
underground morgues no. 1 of the crematories II and III, which had a
surface area of roughly 210 m² (2,260 sq ft), at least 1,000 victims
are said to have been executed at a time. Other witnesses speak of
2,000 or even up to 3,000 victims.
L: That is between ½ and 1½
persons on every square foot. How can you get up to three people to
stand on two square feet? They must have squeezed themselves together
quite extremely?
R: That is quite a logistic problem, indeed. Just
imagine the following scene: 1,000 people of both sexes plus children
enter the undressing room with a surface area of 390 m2 (4,200 ft2).
Each one would therefore have an area of only 60 cm × 60 cm (2×2
ft) on which to undress. Experience shows that people do not pack
themselves tightly to the very edge of an enclosed area, unless, of
course, they are quite willing to do so, like when they enter a bus
and need to fill it tightly, so that other passengers can still get
in.
L: Not even that works most of the times. People simply won't
scoot over to make room for others unless they are informed of what
they need to do and then are also willing to comply. And that is
particularly true if they are told to undress completely in front of
hundreds of strangers of both sexes. That would never work.
R: Correct. Actually, in order to get people to enter through just one
door in a long, stretched out room and to fill it tightly to the last
place, the procedure must be rehearsed. Once inside the naked people
walk over into alleged gas chamber, the same problem occurs again.
Here the victims must press themselves even more tightly together,
since that room was even smaller. The first people entering the room
must proceed to the very end of this 100 ft long room in a
disciplined manner and line up against the wall. The next lot will
form the line directly in front, and so on, until the entire chamber
is full. Even if choreographed perfectly, this would still take at
least half an hour.
L: So how did they get these 1,000 naked people
to pack themselves tightly together, touching other completely naked
strangers?
R: I do not know, but it would have required the drill and
discipline that you can instill only in soldiers after weeks of
exercising, provided they are dressed. I don't know if that would
still work if you had those soldiers line up naked, particularly if
there are female soldiers present as well.
L: Well, that is
ridiculous. After all, under such circumstances, the alleged claim by
the SS that their victims are going to have a shower in that room
would convince nobody. How do you take a shower when your neighbors
step on your feet and you can hardly turn around, not to mention bend
down to wash yourself?
R: You have revealed this absurdity quite
well. So even before going into technical and documentary details,
you can already see that the claims made about those alleged
homicidal gassings are fishy already on pure logistical grounds. In
closing this brief overview of the alleged murder scenarios, it
should also be mentioned that the first report about the alleged
murder methods used in Auschwitz as reported by Boris Polevoy, a
Soviet propagandist writing for the Soviet newspaper Pravda, differed
quite distinctly from what was suggested otherwise: "Last year,
when the Red Army revealed to the world the terrible and abominable
secrets of Majdanek, the Germans in Auschwitz began to wipe out the
traces of their crimes. They leveled the mounds of the so-called
'old' graves in the eastern part of the camp, tore up and
destroyed the traces of the electric conveyor belt, on which hundreds
of people were simultaneously electrocuted, their bodies falling onto
the slow moving conveyor belt which carried them to the top of the
blast furnace where they fell in, were completely burned, their bones
converted to meal in the rolling mills, and then sent to the
surrounding fields."
R: The story about the conveyor belt
electrocution with subsequent incineration in blast furnaces was, of
course, nothing but Soviet atrocity propaganda with no foundation in
reality. It quickly ended up in the trash bins of history and was
replaced with something more "credible," which had been claimed
since 1942: gas chambers. Just how credible these gas chamber
allegations are will be investigated in the next chapters of the
book......
Holocaust or Hoax Jurgen Graf p.149-51
A question to which revisionists would like a convincing answer: What
is the explanation for the irrational behaviour of an entire people
which apparently believes in an absurd (Holocaust) legend?
The Holocaust -- with its gas chambers which constantly change
location; its millions of victims who disappear without a trace into
blue vapour at Auschwitz, Majdanek and Treblinka, after being
murdered by Hitler's SS butchers, either with Zyklon B insecticide or
Diesel exhaust, not to mention mass shootings Babi Yar-style (where
the victims also disappear without a trace) -- is, and remains, first
and foremost a unique proof of the monumental stupidity of our age.
In the early 1980s -- when the major absurdities of the Holocaust
swindle had already been exploded, with the exception of a few
details -- most revisionist researchers thought it inconceivable that
the legend could persist more than a few more years. Since then, more
than 35 years have elapsed, and the Lie continues to drag out its
existence, filthier and more luxuriant than ever! Cracks are
appearing in the edifice of lies, doubts are appearing -- here and
there, in the press, in a few articles, in many private conversations
-- as to the truth of the Establishment version of the fate of the
Jews under the Third Reich.
People mention the possibility of minor errors or exaggerations; but
almost everyone continues to accept the story as basically correct.
It is precisely this general acceptance which is the biggest puzzle
to revisionists -- and to any reasonable person
with a minimum knowledge of history. Really, how can anyone of normal
intelligence, for example, view the room which is shown to millions
of tourists on the grounds of the former camp of Auschwitz as the
"only Nazi gas chamber remaining in original condition", without
immediately realizing that the physical capacity of the room -- not
to mention its immediate surroundings, for example, its proximity to
the hospital located nearby -- would make any mass execution using a
highly dangerous poison gas impossible? The unspeakable atrocity
stories spewed forth to visitors by officials of the Auschwitz
Museum, deserve only ridicule. But the very opposite occurs: in these
shrines dedicated to the Holocaust religion, people become
intellectual cripples: awe-struck, their senses paralyzed, they gape
at everything as if it were plausible, and solemnly swallow
nonsensical fairy tales! Even the generation of Germans which lived
through the war -- i.e., the "generation of criminals", those who
supported the National Socialist system which is now slandered all
over the world, who remained true to that system and fought for it to
the bitter end, with unprecedented self-sacrifice and devotion of
spirit -- that generation no longer knows what to believe after half
a century of filth and lies.
They confuse their personal firsthand experience, that which they saw
and experienced themselves, with that which they think they should
have seen or experienced (according to the official version of
history). Faced with the accusations and ignorance of succeeding
generations, the generation of the war years joins in with the chorus
of self-incrimination or takes refuge in resigned silence. And yet, -
if the gas chambers were technically impossible and the whole story
is therefore a lie; - if no material evidence of the crime remains,
since the Nazis "destroyed all traces of their crimes at the last
moment"; - if millions of bodies simply disappeared into blue vapour,
so that not a single body of a single gassing victim has ever been
found; - if the official version of history is based on nothing but
contradictory "eyewitness testimonies" of witnesses who were never
subjected to cross-examination, and confessions extorted from
"criminals"; - if a forensic report, including a reconstruction as is
ordinary practice in an ordinary murder case, has never even been
attempted; - if expert reports on the technical feasibility of the
mass gassings are never performed by the courts, but only on behalf
of private parties, and if no technical refutation of these reports
can be produced. Then how is it then possible for the world to
believe this series of grotesque hallucinations?
If you ask these questions, most people are either surprised or
shocked. But some people, particularly, young people -- who often
react spontaneously and emotionally - immediately and spontaneously
declare their conviction that the Holocaust is absurd. One hears
remarks like the following: "How could I have believed such nonsense
for all those years?" The revisionist may perhaps be pleased in the
belief that he has won a new adherent. But in most cases, this is a
great mistake. When the shock wears off -- the shock which sets in
following the discovery of a new truth, the new convert returns to
his old environment, where it is almost impossible to find any
information on the subject other than all-pervading Holocaust
propaganda. The average person lacks the courage to deviate from his
environment; the mass media, of course, are all around us. Upon the
slightest expression of doubts, the inevitable reply will be that he
has spoken with a horrid, lying Nazi, that he has heard a load of
lies, and that he had better forget everything he heard. This is
particularly true, unless the convert is a hero willing to jeopardize
his social and professional position for historical truth. Since even
the crudest lie can be obfuscated and explained away, the heretic
falls away from his new belief and returns to the shrine of the
incredible. Credo quia absurdum est. What at first seemed absurd --
in comparison to reasonable information about the absurdity of the
Holocaust religion -- once again seems convincing. In a society in
which propagandists control the media, those who stray from the fold
are quick to permit themselves to be persuaded once again that the
unanimous opinion (Vox Populi, Vox Dei) which confirmed the reality
of the mass extermination of the Jews for over a half a century,
bears incomparably more weight than the statements of a single "Nazi".
This abandonment of the elementary duty to seek the truth can,
however, have unexpectedly unpleasant results. Today, even
re-educated Germans -- despite their anti-fascist fanaticism -- are
regarded with mistrust, even hostility, by many people in all parts
of the world.
The Zionists and their stooges are skilful at ensuring the
perpetuation of this hostility, for example, through hundreds of
films, largely produced by Jews, which depict German soldiers either
as simple fools or sadistic beasts.
The passivity and cowardice of the majority of the German people
today is their decisive contribution to the perpetuation endless
hatred. All of German contemporary history has been turned into a
sort of crime sheet by the Allied victors. The Germans swallow
everything in complete passivity.
A person who refuses to defend himself, ought not to wonder if he is
found guilty. He deserves no respect, and should expect none. Germans
compete with each other in vomiting upon their own people and
themselves at the same time. Do they really expect to gain any
sympathy abroad in this way?
Let us nevertheless attempt to understand the reasons for this
apparently illogical behaviour on the part of the German people.
Perhaps the main reason for it is the knowledge, or instinctive
sense, that any critical discussion of the so-called Holocaust is
dangerous; it can cost the victim his job, his position in society,
and even destroy his family. In addition, many people don't want to
know much about the Holocaust, which is the principal accusation
against the German people, since they intuitively feel that many
things about it simply cannot be true. They are afraid to know
whether the Holocaust is a pack of lies, or just a lie or two; anyone
doubting the details of the official version of history runs the risk
of being compelled to question the story as a whole.
And that is just what our contemporaries, set on their peace and
quiet and comfort at any price, do not want.
On the other hand, it is not easy to live with a lie which one should
long ago have recognized as such, and, at the same time, to act as if
it were no lie at all. For example, how should the mother of a
family, who knows to a certainty that the gas chamber yarn is a lie,
answer a child who asks, eyes wide-open with wonder: "Mama, teacher
told us that German soldiers gassed the Jews. Did Grandpa gas the
Jews, too?" The best way to evade a question like that, which is
complex and painful, is simply to know nothing. So the mother simply
tells the over-curious child, "I don't know, ask your teacher."
Holocaust or Hoax Jurgen Graf P.153
The Holocaust is not just a lie, it is a crime. It is a crime
because it not only justifies innumerable other crimes, but because
it create a huge mass of hatred, which in turn contains the potential
for new crimes.
People whose souls have been drenched in the hatred of the Holocaust
Lie must be counted among its victims. This includes the millions of
twelve to fifteen-year old school children dragged through the
memorials of former concentration camps, often weeping uncontrollably
at the atrocity stories and lies vomited up at them.
How much suffering, how much heartbreak, how many tragedies are due
to the socalled "Holocaust", this hair-raising Lie of the Century,
which the Jews invented, crammed down our throats, and have defended
tooth and nail, with fines, with abuse, with imprisonment, for over
half a century?
It is painful to think of the thousands, indeed tens of thousands, of
people who have been humiliated, persecuted, imprisoned, or even
executed in the name of this shameless swindle.
It is pathetic to see the once-great German people, having lost its
pride, its sense of direction, its self-respect, to such an extent
that it no longer dares to defend itself against a flood of slander
and is too ashamed to look itself in the face. One single mention of
the "gas chambers", the extermination of the Jews, was enough to
justify purging entire cities and provinces of their German
population. Almost 17 million people were driven from their homes
between 1944 and 1948 in an unbroken series of atrocities during
which over two million died.
"After what they did to the Jews, they had it coming to them", is the
classical justification.
It is truly disgusting to think of the millions of people all over
the world watching Marvin Chomsky, Claude Lanzmann, Steven Spielberg
and all the others -- Holocaust, Shoa, Schindler's List, etc. -- in
the cinemas, on television -- and taking it all seriously. The Jews
-- or more exactly, those who claim to speak for the Jews -- invented
a story which they've called the Shoa or the Holocaust, and which
they now claim is the history of their people.
The Holocaust money-making machine has brought them such tremendous
advantages, that they can no longer live without it. But they made
one fatal error: the Holocaust swindle is so endlessly absurd that
its inventors can only take refuge in a suicide charge; having lost
all sense of proportion, they have gone too far and will soon come
crashing down.
To suppress all open debate on the subject appears an impossibility
in the long run, despite all manner of repression. From minor
explanations to wholesale re-writing, including whole new "Revised
Versions", the profiteers of the myth continue to entangle themselves
in increasingly greater numbers of contradictions; the fables of
today contradict the fables told yesterday; the defenders of the
official version of history are being compelled to make so many
concessions that more and more people are starting to wonder about it
all.
Doubts expressed in private conversation no longer shock as much as
they did a few years ago; it is getting easier for revisionists to
gain a hearing.
In brief: for the exterminationists, the time is running out.
Increasingly hysterical repression is an unmistakable sign of growing
panic. It is also a sign of weakness.
Instead of listening to the discussion, they simply grab for a
truncheon. But how long can they get away with it?
The revisionists must not hope for quick victory; it will not come
overnight. They should remember the wisdom expressed in the phrase
from the Czech philosopher, Karel Capek, who said: "Truth must be
smuggled. It must be distributed in small doses. A drop here, a drop
there -- until people get used to it. Not all at once.
At a time when the Lie appears to be triumphing without hinderance,
we would like to close with an optimistic message. We wish to make
the following appeal:
All of you, all friends of the truth, both known and unknown, from
many European countries, those who, like Günter Deckert and
Gottfried Kuessel, Ernst Zundel, have sat in German and Austrian
prisons for "denying the existence of the gas chambers", or who have
been compelled to go into exile like Remer and Rudolf, all persecuted
revisionists and nationalists -- do not lose your courage, since your
struggle against state-ordained lies is not in vain. Your courage,
the sacrifice of a few, will help to free entire nations and peoples,
including the German and Russian peoples -- from the darkness which
has so long covered them.
Even a cursory look at the
holocaust story
by anyone who has any interest in World War 2 Europe reveals that
the standard account does not make sense on many levels, either in
terms of the number of victims or regarding the existence of death camps.
The holocaust’s established narrative has pretty much been contrived
over the past fifty years for political reasons, see
Norman Finkelstein’s brilliant deconstruction of it in his book
"The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering."
Books including the highly praised "Night" written by Eli Wiesel, whom
Finkelstein calls the “high huckster of the holocaust” are largely works
of fiction.
|